<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HoopsAvenue &#187; nba referees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hoopsavenue.com/tag/nba-referees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hoopsavenue.com</link>
	<description>NBA Blog - NBA News &#38; Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No more foul outs!</title>
		<link>http://www.hoopsavenue.com/2008/06/no-more-foul-outs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hoopsavenue.com/2008/06/no-more-foul-outs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HoopsAvenue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeff van gundy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nba referees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nba rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shaquille o'neal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hoopsavenue.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the hoopla around the NBA&#8217;s referee problem lately, I&#8217;d like to recommend a few easy rule changes to the NBA.  First off, the NBA and its referees should be seperate entities.  I know that is not going to happen, but it&#8217;s basically the same thing as a company and its auditors being under [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the hoopla around the NBA&#8217;s referee problem lately, I&#8217;d like to recommend a few easy rule changes to the NBA.  First off, the NBA and its referees should be seperate entities.  I know that is not going to happen, but it&#8217;s basically the same thing as a company and its auditors being under the same umbrella&#8230;bad things are going to happen.  So that would be ideal, but I&#8217;m not holding my breath waiting for it to happen.  I won&#8217;t hold my breath for the following rules changes either, but they might at least be debated in some league circles.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>No more foul outs </strong>- Players should no longer be disqualified for their 6th foul.  I completely agree with Jeff Van Gundy on this count.  The easiest way to fix a game would be to get a star player in foul trouble.  Among the major sports, the star players in basketball far and away have the most influence on their team&#8217;s success.  Without the opportunity to foul out, we&#8217;d see more aggressive defense, but most importantly we&#8217;d never have to worry about our favorite team&#8217;s star player being disqualified due to a questionable call.  On a side note, I&#8217;m sure young big men prone to dumb ticky tack fouls would appreciate this rule change.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Intentional fouls</strong> &#8211; Ok, now this one is an idea I have not heard yet, but I think it&#8217;s a good one.  This has nothing to do at all with flagrant fouls (which as has been discussed ad nauseam by Mike Breen &amp; Co.).  If, in a referee&#8217;s judgment, a foul is committed intentionally and not in the last two minutes of a quarter, the aggrieved team would get one shot plus the ball.  Essentially this means teams can&#8217;t abuse the no foul out rule and play hack-a-<a title="Shaquille O'Neal" href="http://www.hoopsavenue.com/players/Shaquille-O'Neal.html" target="_self">Shaq</a> all game long.  They&#8217;d be giving up far too many possessions to make it a worthwhile play.  I would make sure, though, that if a guy gets beat he still has the leeway to act like he&#8217;s making a play while making major contact to prevent a basket without being assessed an intentional foul.  The intentional fouls would be reserved for the two-arm wrapups of guys where its obvious you just don&#8217;t want to guard them straight up.  There&#8217;s a little room for subjectivity, but not a whole lot.</li>
</ul>
<p>The obvious caveat in the no fouls outs rule is that you have to have something to dissuade teams from playing hack-a-Shaq and I think this second rule does just that.  I would love to see the NBA step up and make this a reality next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hoopsavenue.com/2008/06/no-more-foul-outs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

