Should Kobe ever be compared to Jordan again?
June 19, 2008
Will Kobe ever be compared to Jordan again? Yes, of course. That’s what the media does.
Should he? No, probably not.
The biggest reason is that Jordan never really had an Achilles heel. His biggest weakness was probably that he was not a good three point shooter, but he always found other ways to score no matter who was guarding him. And, his intangibles were always in a league of their own. Kobe, on the other hand, has at least two Achilles heels: his inconsistency in inspiring his teammates and bad timing when it comes to taking over the game.
Let’s look at the cold hard facts. Kobe and the Lakers have now lost two consecutive Finals series and both times his team didn’t even show up for half the series. In 2004, it was Kobe’s selfishness and the Lakers’ overall lack of respect for the Pistons (the Malone injury didn’t help either) that did them in. Now, in 2008, Kobe has matured a bit, but you still have to question his leadership when a team falls flat on its face in the most important games of its season. No, it is not all Kobe’s fault, not by a long shot, but ask yourself if Michael Jordan would ever lose a Finals game by 30+ points. He never did. The most a Jordan-led Bulls team ever lost by in the Finals was by 21 to Seattle in 1996. Oh, and that was a Game 4 with the Bulls up 3-0.
With all that said, Kobe is still the best player in the game. You can make good arguments for a few other players (Pierce is creeping up there), but I would still put Kobe at the top of the list. He’s now got a good supporting cast and has a good chance to return to the Finals next season, but we’ve seen that he doesn’t quite have the it factor that Jordan did. Jordan would take over a game before it got out of hand. Kobe should have done that last night, but he didn’t. He should have never allowed himself to get so out of rhythm in Game 4 either despite the big lead. We know Kobe has the ability to take over, but his timing just seems off sometimes. Jordan seemed to know when to take over a game. He understood the idea of momentum a lot better than Kobe does. Last night I got the feeling that Kobe never really got worried until it was too late. I don’t think he gave up, but he had the memory of coming back from 24 down in Game 4 in the back of his head and by the time he felt a sense of urgency, there was no way to stop the Celtic onslaught. He underestimated the determination of KG, Pierce, and company. This was simply not a game you were going to overcome a big deficit.
Kobe might become a better leader and he might get a better feel for when to take over a game, but after last night, his legacy simply cannot live up to Jordan’s. Even if he wins six titles, three of them would have been with Shaq. That, plus the black scars on his legacy from 2004 and 2008 preclude him from being mentioned alongside Jordan as the Greatest Ever. He may be Jordan’s equal as far as talent, but Jordan had that innate intangible that Kobe is still learning on the job.
Digg This!
Save to del.icio.us
Hype It Up
Comments
One Response to “Should Kobe ever be compared to Jordan again?”
Got something to say?
Loading ...
Kobe is nowhere near Jordan. As you mentioned in your article, MJ wasn’t known as a great 3 pt shooter, but on the world’s biggest stage…MJ shot 37% from 3 pt range while Kobe shot 28% going into the Boston series (imagine MJ’s shooting % with Shaq drawing triple-teams down low). That’s a pretty telling stat and further emphasizes MJ’s ability to elevate his game when it was needed the most. MJ also never got embarrassed defensively the way Kobe did this series on those occasions where he was matched up with Pierce.
Blowing 24 point leads and getting waxed by 39 points in Finals games…not very MJ-like. This comparison is OFFICIALLY DEAD and only surpassed on the ludicrous meter by ABC’s efforts at painting Kobe as a humble family man at every nauseous turn.